<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Darwin Matters: The Case Against Intelligent Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atheistblogger.com/2008/05/02/why-darwin-matters-the-case-against-intelligent-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atheistblogger.com/2008/05/02/why-darwin-matters-the-case-against-intelligent-design/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:20:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kieran</title>
		<link>http://atheistblogger.com/2008/05/02/why-darwin-matters-the-case-against-intelligent-design/comment-page-1/#comment-1540</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 14:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistblogger.com/?p=87#comment-1540</guid>
		<description>tsk tsk thatsagreatquestion, remember Godwin&#039;s law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tsk tsk thatsagreatquestion, remember Godwin&#8217;s law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Hayter</title>
		<link>http://atheistblogger.com/2008/05/02/why-darwin-matters-the-case-against-intelligent-design/comment-page-1/#comment-1516</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Hayter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 16:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistblogger.com/?p=87#comment-1516</guid>
		<description>thatsagreatquestion,

You answered your own question there...
You asked if Shermer would have been tolerant towards the Nazi&#039;s, and then quote him saying any group that sets itself as the final moral arbiter (like the Nazi&#039;s did) is the beginning of the end.
Likewise, with your second question. Shermer says that it&#039;s wrong for a group of people to say what is right and wrong, and the Nazi&#039;s proved this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thatsagreatquestion,</p>
<p>You answered your own question there&#8230;<br />
You asked if Shermer would have been tolerant towards the Nazi&#8217;s, and then quote him saying any group that sets itself as the final moral arbiter (like the Nazi&#8217;s did) is the beginning of the end.<br />
Likewise, with your second question. Shermer says that it&#8217;s wrong for a group of people to say what is right and wrong, and the Nazi&#8217;s proved this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thatsagreatquestion</title>
		<link>http://atheistblogger.com/2008/05/02/why-darwin-matters-the-case-against-intelligent-design/comment-page-1/#comment-1512</link>
		<dc:creator>thatsagreatquestion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 05:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistblogger.com/?p=87#comment-1512</guid>
		<description>Michael Shermer said, &quot;As long as it is understood that morality is a human construction influenced by human cultures, one can become more tolerant of other human belief systems, and thus other humans.&quot; I&#039;d like to know if Mr. Shermer would have been tolerant towards Hitler and the Nazi&#039;s

&quot;But as soon as a group sets itself up to be the final moral arbiter of other people&#039;s actions, especially when its members believe they have discovered absolute standards of right and wrong, it is the beginning of the end of tolerance and thus, reason and rationality. &quot; THE UNLIKELIEST CULT IN HISTORY,  http://www.2think.org/02_2_she.shtml

Why does Mr. Shermer say that it&#039;s wrong for a [human] group to say what is right and wrong for other groups, wrong for us?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Shermer said, &#8220;As long as it is understood that morality is a human construction influenced by human cultures, one can become more tolerant of other human belief systems, and thus other humans.&#8221; I&#8217;d like to know if Mr. Shermer would have been tolerant towards Hitler and the Nazi&#8217;s</p>
<p>&#8220;But as soon as a group sets itself up to be the final moral arbiter of other people&#8217;s actions, especially when its members believe they have discovered absolute standards of right and wrong, it is the beginning of the end of tolerance and thus, reason and rationality. &#8221; THE UNLIKELIEST CULT IN HISTORY,  <a href="http://www.2think.org/02_2_she.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.2think.org/02_2_she.shtml</a></p>
<p>Why does Mr. Shermer say that it&#8217;s wrong for a [human] group to say what is right and wrong for other groups, wrong for us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crashmaster</title>
		<link>http://atheistblogger.com/2008/05/02/why-darwin-matters-the-case-against-intelligent-design/comment-page-1/#comment-1505</link>
		<dc:creator>Crashmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 01:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistblogger.com/?p=87#comment-1505</guid>
		<description>I have a signed hardback copy. Gonna be nice to read it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a signed hardback copy. Gonna be nice to read it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Hayter</title>
		<link>http://atheistblogger.com/2008/05/02/why-darwin-matters-the-case-against-intelligent-design/comment-page-1/#comment-1494</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Hayter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 17:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistblogger.com/?p=87#comment-1494</guid>
		<description>Yup, I ordered mine over Amazon this morning. Unfortunately for me, the UK paperback was cheaper, but oh well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, I ordered mine over Amazon this morning. Unfortunately for me, the UK paperback was cheaper, but oh well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://atheistblogger.com/2008/05/02/why-darwin-matters-the-case-against-intelligent-design/comment-page-1/#comment-1492</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 16:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistblogger.com/?p=87#comment-1492</guid>
		<description>Sweet. I&#039;m picking up my copy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet. I&#8217;m picking up my copy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--f0c25b539901624b460e129d15264305-->