<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evolution Is Not A Fraud!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atheistblogger.com/2008/07/25/evolution-is-not-a-fraud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atheistblogger.com/2008/07/25/evolution-is-not-a-fraud/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Madison</title>
		<link>http://atheistblogger.com/2008/07/25/evolution-is-not-a-fraud/#comment-4082</link>
		<dc:creator>Madison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistblogger.com/?p=276#comment-4082</guid>
		<description>okay i am a christian but you do have Some good reasons i don't nescisarily belive your concept but i see where your coming from You ask why we believe in God and that we are stupid for believing that God couldn't have just said BAM theres the humans BAM theres the apes but think who made the tiny little organism WHO made that organism thats what makes your idea so unbelievable. Good fight but God still won.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>okay i am a christian but you do have Some good reasons i don&#8217;t nescisarily belive your concept but i see where your coming from You ask why we believe in God and that we are stupid for believing that God couldn&#8217;t have just said BAM theres the humans BAM theres the apes but think who made the tiny little organism WHO made that organism thats what makes your idea so unbelievable. Good fight but God still won.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evolution Poll Results - The Atheist Blogger</title>
		<link>http://atheistblogger.com/2008/07/25/evolution-is-not-a-fraud/#comment-3029</link>
		<dc:creator>Evolution Poll Results - The Atheist Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistblogger.com/?p=276#comment-3029</guid>
		<description>[...] few weeks ago I debunked a Christian&#8217;s view of Evolution and started a poll to see what percentage of readers believed Evolution. I predicted that the vast [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few weeks ago I debunked a Christian&#8217;s view of Evolution and started a poll to see what percentage of readers believed Evolution. I predicted that the vast [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: db0</title>
		<link>http://atheistblogger.com/2008/07/25/evolution-is-not-a-fraud/#comment-2842</link>
		<dc:creator>db0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistblogger.com/?p=276#comment-2842</guid>
		<description>So what you're saying is that you're prepared to give credit to all these scientists of which the vast percentage have nothing to do with biology (seriously, geologists?) but you are prepared to ignore the scientific consensus of people who have actually studied the topic?

How exactly does that make sense?

It's as inane as presenting a geologist arguing that the sun moves around the earth or an dentist making arguing that heart surgery is impossible...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what you&#8217;re saying is that you&#8217;re prepared to give credit to all these scientists of which the vast percentage have nothing to do with biology (seriously, geologists?) but you are prepared to ignore the scientific consensus of people who have actually studied the topic?</p>
<p>How exactly does that make sense?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s as inane as presenting a geologist arguing that the sun moves around the earth or an dentist making arguing that heart surgery is impossible&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Hayter</title>
		<link>http://atheistblogger.com/2008/07/25/evolution-is-not-a-fraud/#comment-2841</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Hayter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistblogger.com/?p=276#comment-2841</guid>
		<description>" We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged."

Pretty much everyone can sign to that agreement. I'd sign it because I'm a skeptic about most things (even Evolution) and I agree that careful examination of the evidence should be encouraged.

Having said that, I also agree that the current evidence and examinations of it have only supported the theory, and it is by far the most complete explanation we have so far for the development of life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged.&#8221;</p>
<p>Pretty much everyone can sign to that agreement. I&#8217;d sign it because I&#8217;m a skeptic about most things (even Evolution) and I agree that careful examination of the evidence should be encouraged.</p>
<p>Having said that, I also agree that the current evidence and examinations of it have only supported the theory, and it is by far the most complete explanation we have so far for the development of life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://atheistblogger.com/2008/07/25/evolution-is-not-a-fraud/#comment-2840</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistblogger.com/?p=276#comment-2840</guid>
		<description>Yes, we all heard of that old project Steve but if just click the name on that list I gave you it gives the credentials of the individual. But if you would like more there is plenty. Here is a large list: &lt;a href="http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?command=download&#38;id=660"&gt;A SCIENTIFIC DISSENT FROM DARWINISM&lt;/a&gt; and another with comments: &lt;a href="http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2007/08/03/creation-scientists-teachers-comment"&gt;Creation Scientists and Teachers Comment&lt;/a&gt;

I am sure your presupposition can't allow you to believe as these accredited scientists believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, we all heard of that old project Steve but if just click the name on that list I gave you it gives the credentials of the individual. But if you would like more there is plenty. Here is a large list: <a href="http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?command=download&amp;id=660">A SCIENTIFIC DISSENT FROM DARWINISM</a> and another with comments: <a href="http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2007/08/03/creation-scientists-teachers-comment">Creation Scientists and Teachers Comment</a></p>
<p>I am sure your presupposition can&#8217;t allow you to believe as these accredited scientists believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: db0</title>
		<link>http://atheistblogger.com/2008/07/25/evolution-is-not-a-fraud/#comment-2830</link>
		<dc:creator>db0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistblogger.com/?p=276#comment-2830</guid>
		<description>Oh gawds, not this argument again.

Some ridiculous lists have been shown time and time again to be absurd. Tell us Dan, in WHICH science do these cretinists hold a doctorate? Chemistry? Astronomy? I notice that the site doesn't mention it which leads me to believe it's certainly something else other than Biology.

Look, there's &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Steve"&gt;more scientists called Steve&lt;/a&gt; that believe in Evolution than there are creationist scientists of any kind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh gawds, not this argument again.</p>
<p>Some ridiculous lists have been shown time and time again to be absurd. Tell us Dan, in WHICH science do these cretinists hold a doctorate? Chemistry? Astronomy? I notice that the site doesn&#8217;t mention it which leads me to believe it&#8217;s certainly something else other than Biology.</p>
<p>Look, there&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Steve">more scientists called Steve</a> that believe in Evolution than there are creationist scientists of any kind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Hayter</title>
		<link>http://atheistblogger.com/2008/07/25/evolution-is-not-a-fraud/#comment-2828</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Hayter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistblogger.com/?p=276#comment-2828</guid>
		<description>Dan,

I'd hardly call that list "many". The page is highly bias because it lists only 16 Evolutionists compared to 94 Creationists, as if to try and show that more scientists believe Creationism. The two categories are also unfairly labeled, the first being simply "Creationists holding doctorates in science" (not necessarily Biology I might add) compared to "&lt;b&gt;Leading&lt;/b&gt; Evolutionists". 95% of scientists believe in Evolution, so why can't they be held in consideration?

It seems strange that you would reject Evolution, something with so much evidence, for Creationism, something with no evidence.If only you stopped reading Creationist propaganda and actually sat down and took a class on Evolutionary biology (would that really hurt so much?) you would learn more about the theory. You have been brainwashed by Creationists to think that the theory is dangerous, incomplete, and has no evidence, when the opposite is true.

I implore you to look at both sides as I have done on many occasions. I've read Behe's work, read through creationist websites, and any questions I find I ask about on Evolution sites or get my biologist friends to explain for me. There has not been one valid question that has been unanswered for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,</p>
<p>I&#8217;d hardly call that list &#8220;many&#8221;. The page is highly bias because it lists only 16 Evolutionists compared to 94 Creationists, as if to try and show that more scientists believe Creationism. The two categories are also unfairly labeled, the first being simply &#8220;Creationists holding doctorates in science&#8221; (not necessarily Biology I might add) compared to &#8220;<b>Leading</b> Evolutionists&#8221;. 95% of scientists believe in Evolution, so why can&#8217;t they be held in consideration?</p>
<p>It seems strange that you would reject Evolution, something with so much evidence, for Creationism, something with no evidence.If only you stopped reading Creationist propaganda and actually sat down and took a class on Evolutionary biology (would that really hurt so much?) you would learn more about the theory. You have been brainwashed by Creationists to think that the theory is dangerous, incomplete, and has no evidence, when the opposite is true.</p>
<p>I implore you to look at both sides as I have done on many occasions. I&#8217;ve read Behe&#8217;s work, read through creationist websites, and any questions I find I ask about on Evolution sites or get my biologist friends to explain for me. There has not been one valid question that has been unanswered for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://atheistblogger.com/2008/07/25/evolution-is-not-a-fraud/#comment-2821</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistblogger.com/?p=276#comment-2821</guid>
		<description>I am not the only one that holds this viewpoint. Many highly accredited Scientists believe in a Creator instead of evolution. Here is a little handy list: &lt;a href="http://www.christiananswers.net/creation/people/home.html"&gt;Creationists holding DOCTORATES IN SCIENCE&lt;/a&gt;

I briefly skimmed this article called: &lt;a href="http://www.scienceagainstevolution.org/v5i10f.htm"&gt;Some Real Scientists Reject Evolution&lt;/a&gt; which has good referenced facts in it.

Thanks to that article (Some Real Scientists Reject Evolution) I found out about A book that was written and is available online to read if you choose. It's called &lt;a href="http://www.hyahya.org/evolution_introduction.php"&gt;The Evolution Deceit&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not the only one that holds this viewpoint. Many highly accredited Scientists believe in a Creator instead of evolution. Here is a little handy list: <a href="http://www.christiananswers.net/creation/people/home.html">Creationists holding DOCTORATES IN SCIENCE</a></p>
<p>I briefly skimmed this article called: <a href="http://www.scienceagainstevolution.org/v5i10f.htm">Some Real Scientists Reject Evolution</a> which has good referenced facts in it.</p>
<p>Thanks to that article (Some Real Scientists Reject Evolution) I found out about A book that was written and is available online to read if you choose. It&#8217;s called <a href="http://www.hyahya.org/evolution_introduction.php">The Evolution Deceit</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: db0</title>
		<link>http://atheistblogger.com/2008/07/25/evolution-is-not-a-fraud/#comment-2747</link>
		<dc:creator>db0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistblogger.com/?p=276#comment-2747</guid>
		<description>I see you're putting the footnotes to good use. You can makem links if you want, they do not have to be plain text.

Yes, that's the only comment I have to make about this article. Refuting cretinists is like shooting fish in a barrel these days...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see you&#8217;re putting the footnotes to good use. You can makem links if you want, they do not have to be plain text.</p>
<p>Yes, that&#8217;s the only comment I have to make about this article. Refuting cretinists is like shooting fish in a barrel these days&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evolution Poll - The Atheist Blogger</title>
		<link>http://atheistblogger.com/2008/07/25/evolution-is-not-a-fraud/#comment-2742</link>
		<dc:creator>Evolution Poll - The Atheist Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistblogger.com/?p=276#comment-2742</guid>
		<description>[...] you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!Recent debunkings of Creationist flaws leads me to ponder how many people believe in Evolution and what relation these results have with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you&#8217;re new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!Recent debunkings of Creationist flaws leads me to ponder how many people believe in Evolution and what relation these results have with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
