"I have observed that the world has suffered far less from ignorance than from pretensions to knowledge. It is not skeptics or explorers but fanatics and ideologues who menace decency and progress. No agnostic ever burned anyone at the stake or tortured a pagan, a heretic, or an unbeliever."Daniel Boorstin



Please help out the Big Fat Atheist Quiz Of The Year by submitting multiple choice questions!

Crackergate Aftermath

A week ago PZ Myers asked everyone to email the president of UCF to complain / voice concerns over the handling of students Webster Cook and Benjamin Collard. I sent a short email, along with a few other hundred people. Today I received this response:

Thank you for your e-mail.

Laws regarding student privacy prevent us from commenting about
individual UCF students. But, in general terms, when a student allegedly
violates student rules of conduct, his or her student account is placed
on hold.

The student is notified of this action and informed that the hold will
not prevent registration for classes. A student is allowed to register
after making a request to release the hold. The Office of Student
Conduct follows this procedure for any student who is referred to it.

More information about the entire Golden Rule and the student conduct
process is available on our Web site, www.ucf.edu. Please be assured
that UCF is committed to following its standard procedures to ensure
fair outcomes in all student conduct review cases.

Additionally, it is the university’s policy to treat all people with
dignity and respect, without regard to race, creed, color, national
origin, religion, sex, age, disability, marital status, sexual
orientation, veteran status, or political opinions and affiliations.

Amy J. Barnickel
Senior Executive Assistant to the President

From Promise to Prominence:
Celebrating 40 Years

Of course its the standard copy/paste response that was probably sent to everyone, but it’s the last paragraph that confuses me. Firstly I’m happy that Cook and Collard are not going to suffer any setbacks in their education because of this, but the so called “policy” outlined in the last paragraph clearly states

without regard to race, creed, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, veteran status, or political opinions and affiliations.

Clearly the university is going against its own policy by regarding the religion of others over the individual. If the policy actually counted for anything, this whole issue would have been brushed aside as “free expression”, the same as any political statement or opinion. The UCF need to stop bowing to demands of evil religious organisations and start thinking of their students.

  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • The Atheist Spot
  • Facebook
  • Google

Possibly Related Posts:

Subscribe to my RSS Feed if you like what you read!

Written by Adrian Hayter

July 31st, 2008 at 4:43 pm

One Response to 'Crackergate Aftermath'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Crackergate Aftermath'.

  1. #1

    I 100% do not disagree with the converse of the counterpoint of this argument when considered in the framework of socio-economic analysis and revolutionary politics.

    Bart Barnes

    27 Aug 08 at 2:46 am (GMT)

Leave a Reply


XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

NOTE: Comments with 2 or more links are automatically marked for moderation. Please don't post your comment again if you don't see it come up, it doesn't help anyone.

Please copy the string jm6TNv to the field below: