<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Postponing Carl Sagan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atheistblogger.com/2008/08/30/postponing-carl-sagan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atheistblogger.com/2008/08/30/postponing-carl-sagan/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben Abbott</title>
		<link>http://atheistblogger.com/2008/08/30/postponing-carl-sagan/comment-page-1/#comment-3532</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Abbott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistblogger.com/?p=525#comment-3532</guid>
		<description>Alex asked: "wait, why would it be a problem for science? Wouldn’t it be a problem for engineering?"

Do you ask about the "singularity"?

It is a problem for science because it is a manifestation of the models/theories of natural phenomena which science seeks to understand.

They are not a problem for engineering as *true* singularities do not exist.

However they can be a &lt;i&gt;problem&lt;/i&gt; for engineering student taking a course in &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_complex_analysis_topics" rel="nofollow"&gt;complex analysis&lt;/a&gt; ;-)

... or for that matter for engineers who use &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Residue_(complex_analysis)" rel="nofollow"&gt;residues&lt;/a&gt; in their work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex asked: &#8220;wait, why would it be a problem for science? Wouldn’t it be a problem for engineering?&#8221;</p>
<p>Do you ask about the &#8220;singularity&#8221;?</p>
<p>It is a problem for science because it is a manifestation of the models/theories of natural phenomena which science seeks to understand.</p>
<p>They are not a problem for engineering as *true* singularities do not exist.</p>
<p>However they can be a <i>problem</i> for engineering student taking a course in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_complex_analysis_topics" rel="nofollow">complex analysis</a> ;-)</p>
<p>&#8230; or for that matter for engineers who use <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Residue_(complex_analysis)" rel="nofollow">residues</a> in their work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://atheistblogger.com/2008/08/30/postponing-carl-sagan/comment-page-1/#comment-3524</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 02:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistblogger.com/?p=525#comment-3524</guid>
		<description>wait, why would it be a problem for science? Wouldn't it be a problem for engineering?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wait, why would it be a problem for science? Wouldn&#8217;t it be a problem for engineering?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Abbott</title>
		<link>http://atheistblogger.com/2008/08/30/postponing-carl-sagan/comment-page-1/#comment-3517</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Abbott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistblogger.com/?p=525#comment-3517</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I was just wondering how often if ever the singularity is discussed here.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

"The singularity" is a problem for science. There are none in nature.

... discussion begun ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I was just wondering how often if ever the singularity is discussed here.</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;The singularity&#8221; is a problem for science. There are none in nature.</p>
<p>&#8230; discussion begun ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Hayter</title>
		<link>http://atheistblogger.com/2008/08/30/postponing-carl-sagan/comment-page-1/#comment-3515</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Hayter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 22:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistblogger.com/?p=525#comment-3515</guid>
		<description>Alex,

I don't really discuss it much. I'm just really not that interested in it as a concept (not to mention it goes over my head). I like the science I can understand :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really discuss it much. I&#8217;m just really not that interested in it as a concept (not to mention it goes over my head). I like the science I can understand :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://atheistblogger.com/2008/08/30/postponing-carl-sagan/comment-page-1/#comment-3500</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 06:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistblogger.com/?p=525#comment-3500</guid>
		<description>Hey, I'm new to this blog. I was just wondering how often if ever the singularity is discussed here. I've been reading some books by Ray Kurzweil on the subject and can't help but find it relevant to the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I&#8217;m new to this blog. I was just wondering how often if ever the singularity is discussed here. I&#8217;ve been reading some books by Ray Kurzweil on the subject and can&#8217;t help but find it relevant to the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amiable</title>
		<link>http://atheistblogger.com/2008/08/30/postponing-carl-sagan/comment-page-1/#comment-3464</link>
		<dc:creator>amiable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atheistblogger.com/?p=525#comment-3464</guid>
		<description>thank you so much for the heads up, adrian! i have no clue what happened, but it's fixed now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you so much for the heads up, adrian! i have no clue what happened, but it&#8217;s fixed now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
