http://atheistblogger.com/2009/02/03/my-atheist-bus/ Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:46:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 http://atheistblogger.com/2009/02/03/my-atheist-bus/comment-page-1/#comment-5090 Steve Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:46:35 +0000 http://atheistblogger.com/?p=1005#comment-5090 Oh and, by the way, search for "Tom Mayer" if you want to skip to the interesting parts! Oh and, by the way, search for "Tom Mayer" if you want to skip to the interesting parts!

]]> http://atheistblogger.com/2009/02/03/my-atheist-bus/comment-page-1/#comment-5089 Steve Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:45:20 +0000 http://atheistblogger.com/?p=1005#comment-5089 Currently, there is big discussion goin on about this in the comments over at <a href="http://www.standfirminfaith.com/index.php/site/article/20080/." target="_blank">http://www.standfirminfaith.com/index.php/site/ar...</a> I think this guy has some points, but most answers are just plain stupid (what would you expect, anyways?). Currently, there is big discussion goin on about this in the comments over at http://www.standfirminfaith.com/index.php/site/ar...
I think this guy has some points, but most answers are just plain stupid (what would you expect, anyways?).

]]> http://atheistblogger.com/2009/02/03/my-atheist-bus/comment-page-1/#comment-5088 james Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:10:24 +0000 http://atheistblogger.com/?p=1005#comment-5088 So, you also can't say there is no {Ahura Mazda, Zeus, Osiris, Invisible Pink Unicorn, Flying Spaghetti Monster, Eris, Satan}, right? All those things seem to be equally likely to exist? But the likelihood that their existence will be proven is so close to zero that I would be willing to call it zero and take the hit if it turns out I'm wrong. So, you also can't say there is no {Ahura Mazda, Zeus, Osiris, Invisible Pink Unicorn, Flying Spaghetti Monster, Eris, Satan}, right? All those things seem to be equally likely to exist? But the likelihood that their existence will be proven is so close to zero that I would be willing to call it zero and take the hit if it turns out I'm wrong.

]]>