Conservapedia Article of the Month (and Year)
Well just look at that, the young earth creationists, fundamentalist Christians, and general ignorant conservatives over at the vile mess of misinformation “Conservapedia” have selected their article on Richard Dawkins as the article of the month for February! To add insult to injury, the article of the year just happens to be on Evolution, a piece of horrendous propaganda that has no science in it whatsoever, and tries to link the theory of Evolution to Nazism and general racism. How a scientific theory (which is after all an inanimate concept) can be held as the cause of the holocaust is rather beyond me.
Not only do these articles simply rely on lies and misconstruing scientific research (and often just making stuff up), they are full of logical fallacies. For instance, in the main page excerpt for the “article of the year”, Conservapedia writes:
In 2006, the prestigious science journal Science reported concerning the United States: “The percentage of people in the country who accept the idea of evolution has declined from 45 in 1985 to 40 in 2005. Meanwhile the fraction of Americans unsure about evolution has soared from 7 per cent in 1985 to 21 per cent last year.”
As if this is proof of anything other than the American society’s general lack of science education or outright ignorance or refusal to do proper research into the area! On the actual article page, a critical analysis is given of the statistics within the scientific community, with possible explanations as to why so many scientists accept the theory (think “Expelled”). Here are a few section headings from the article:
- Evolutionary Theory and Cases of Fraud, Hoaxes and Speculation (No idea what hoaxes and frauds have to do with the theory…if anything they prove science works)
- Lack of Any Clear Transitional Forms (Of course they forget to define what the word “clear” entails. Perhaps they want a fossil of the crocoduck)
- Age of the Earth and Universe and the Theory of Evolution (Let’s just combine physics and biology fora moment…)
- Creation Scientists Tend to Win the Creation-Evolution Debates (No such thing as a creation scientist, nor has any creationist actually won a debate on points. Style maybe, but points? No.)
- Theory of Evolution and Liberalism (Just to throw some liberal bashing into the mix as well)
The Richard Dawkins article spreads the lie that Dawkins was “stumped” by a creationist question, and that he has failed to answer this question ever since. For those who are interested, a detailed analysis of the video and the facts behind it can be found here.

Contact Adrian Hayter
My Facebook
My Atheist Nexus Page
My Twitter
My Reddit
My Atheist Spot
My FriendFeed
My Technorati
Atheist Forums

