Randi on YouTube Suspension

Much as I love James Randi and the JREF, I have to disagree with him in this video, where he says YouTube didn’t act unfairly over the JREF channel suspension.

It is unbelievably unfair to punish an entire channel for the contents of one video (or two videos, or three, or…you get the picture). It makes it even more unfair when the other videos on that channel are educational, and taking down such videos for a week means that people cannot use them for educational purposes. Videos should be suspended, so should the channel’s rights to upload a video, but suspending an entire channel is going completely over the top. P.Z. Myers summed it up nicely:

Responding to a violation by automatically yanking the whole account is not appropriate and civilized behavior, especially when it can be resolved by an amicable communication. How about communicating first, and then yanking if someone is intransigent? The problem is that not everyone has the resources or the clout of the JREF, and there have been far too many cases of individuals getting shut down on entirely bogus complaints.

  • email
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Twitter

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Murdats
    April 15th, 2009 at 09:19 | #1

    you can blame the DMCA for youtubes behaviour.

    if you don't act immediately on a take down request you are liable for a lot of money, and youtube doesn't have the resources to follow them all up so the logical course of action is act on them immediately then look into the validity of disputes.

    youtube is merely following the ridiculous unfair laws pushed by the media industry.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Please copy the string bXTPjY to the field below:

The Atheist Blogger